Talk:Multitenancy and working with finances across borders: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '* Legal issues There are many legal issues to be resolved before anything like this could be implemented. # The offices are separate legal entities and therefore would need their…') |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 10:59, 30 August 2013
- Legal issues
There are many legal issues to be resolved before anything like this could be implemented.
- The offices are separate legal entities and therefore would need their own accounting system.
- In addition it's not even clear if an agreement on the data aggregation itself exists, not to mention a super user instance that can see and evaluate all their data.
- Cross links to foreign accounts and cost centres would not be permitted as the accounting procedures of
one office messes up the balances of the other.
- technical implementation
- When it comes to the technical implementation, the site key already - to a certain extent - represents the tenant ID.
- evaluating and aggregating the data will require a data-warehouse style platform with specific reporting tables in order to handle the steadily increasing data volume